Posts Tagged ‘nuclear weapons’

A Truly Crucial Obligation

Friday, December 11th, 2009

The following is a piece I’ve choreographed, whose component quotations all derive from Pinter’s Art, Truth & Politics

Power

The United States “now occupies 702 military installations throughout the world in 132 countries… We don’t quite know how they got there but they are there all right.” It “possesses 8,000 active and operational nuclear warheads. Two thousand are on hair trigger alert, ready to be launched with 15 minutes warning…”.

“Who, I wonder, are they aiming at? Osama bin Laden? You? Me? … China? Paris? Who knows? What we do know is that this infantile insanity - the possession and threatened use of nuclear weapons - is at the heart of present American political philosophy.”

Hiroshima

The Crux

“To maintain [this] power it is essential that people remain in ignorance, that they live in ignorance of the truth, even the truth of their own lives. What surrounds us therefore is a vast tapestry of lies, upon which we feed.”

“You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis… It quite simply doesn’t give a damn about the United Nations, international law or critical dissent, which it regards as impotent and irrelevant… As a salesman it is out on its own and its most saleable commodity is self love.”

Blood

The US and United Kingdom have “brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it ‘bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East’”. The instigators of the invasion, “Bush and Blair place death well away on the back burner… [for] [b]lood is dirty. It dirties your shirt and tie when you’re making a sincere speech on television.” The Iraqi dead “are of no moment. Their deaths don’t exist. They are blank. They are not even recorded as being dead.” The crimes of the USA and UK simply “never happened… Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest.”

Bush and Blair

Guantanamo

Look also at “Guantanamo Bay: hundreds of people detained without charge for over three years, with no legal representation or due process, technically detained forever. This totally illegitimate structure is maintained in defiance of the Geneva Convention. It is not only tolerated but hardly thought about by what’s called the ‘international community’. This criminal outrage is being committed by a country, which declares itself to be ‘the leader of the free world’.”

“Do we think about the inhabitants of Guantanamo Bay? What does the media say about them? They pop up occasionally - a small item on page six. They have been consigned to a no man’s land from which indeed they may never return. What has the British Foreign Secretary said about this? Nothing. What has the British Prime Minister said about this? Nothing.”

Hope

Yet “I believe that despite the enormous odds which exist, unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory.”

“If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what is so nearly lost to us - the dignity of man.”

-&-

Watch Pinter’s Art, Truth and Politics

Read Pinter’s Art, Truth and Politics

Harold Pinter

Iran in The Times

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Yesterday’s The Times newspaper featured this article on its front-page, entitled Iran could make an atom bomb. I urge you to read it while bearing the following in mind:

  • Israel has one of the largest armies in the world, already has nuclear power and nuclear weapons, and routinely breaks international law. In fact, the USA gives Israel many of its nuclear weapons. Why is Israel’s neighbour, Iran not allowed even to have nuclear power? Is it because it is the only resource-rich Muslim state not in US control left in the world?
  • The whole article has been prompted into existence by a leaked intelligence report. Do you not think that this is ridiculous? This is the same sort of ‘intelligence’ that was actually believed by some people and indeed led to the illegal occupation of Iraq and the death of 1 million Iraqis and thousands of Western soldiers.

  • How is it that The Times can just perpetuate the paradigm that Iran is not worthy of nuclear power but others like Israel are? It devotes no words to a debate on whether Iran ’should’ ‘get away with’ having nuclear power.
  • Israel has nuclear weapons that can reach any part of the world. Yet, regarding the range of different nuclear weapons, all we hear is how “Iran has done extensive research and testing on how to fashion the components of a nuclear payload to be delivered by the Shahab 3, a medium-range missile capable of hitting Israel and parts of southern Europe”.
  • Why does the article feature many quotations from people like Obama’s National Security Advisor, but there is only one quotation from an Iranian person? The only quotation from an Iranian person is from Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s Supreme Leader who apparently said in 1984 that “a nuclear arsenal would serve Iran as a deterrent in the hands of God’s soldiers”. The article attacks Iran and villanizes it. Yet the only quotation from an Iranian person is not from a politician, it is from 1984 and features the word ‘God’. If you don’t believe that Iran is our new target, in part, because it is a Muslim state, think seriously about the significance of this being the only quotation carried from an Iranian person in the entire article, and that it features a religious point.

If you want something to counter the mainstream warmongering, try getting your news from somewhere like The Real News Network.

Thanks for reading.